This study quantifies methane emissions in clean areas of Western China using TROPOMI XCH4 observations and a mass conserving method, while explicitly considering observational uncertainty. All resulting physically unrealistic emissions values are successfully identified and filtered using a mixture of a threshold-based approach and a stochastic approach focused on the impacts of the pixel-by-pixel and day-by-day XCH4 uncertainty. A resulting minimum emission retrieval value of 0.5-1.8 μg/m²/s is obtained, which is lower than existing minimum thresholds using TROPOMI. Additionally, our results demonstrate that there is a 5% emissions bias due to the non-linearity of the gradient term when the XCH4 contains a 10% error. This method does not randomly remove negative values and retain positive values, therefore providing robust and reliable quantification of emissions under conditions of data uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: