This paper reflects on the tendency of the curriculum in Indonesia, which is antecedent. The curriculum was conceived and developed because of the bad precedents that befell this nation. The curriculum in the school seems to be a "panacea" that can cure diseases in society. The dominance then strengthens this condition carried out by the school over the development of students. So that students feel that they are instruments of "trial" and imprisoned in their creativity for the better. The curriculum should be constructed based on fulfilling the ideals of the Indonesian nation and referring to a definite interest for developing students’ personalities. This study aims to counter the trend of the curriculum in Indonesia, which is ante centric. The research method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive approach. The results of this study state that the process of actualization of education and learning in schools will always be temporary (hypo-knowledge), which at some point will "cheat" in various forms, according to the parameters and indicators that accompany it, both like evidentiality, locality, contextuality and because the weak "fingers" of truth grip an era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arbi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: