The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is the most prominent multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for realworld applications.While it performs evidently well on bi-objective optimization problems, empirical studies suggest that it is less effective when applied to problems with more than two objectives.A recent mathematical runtime analysis confirmed this observation by proving that the NGSA-II for an exponential number of iterations misses a constant factor of the Pareto front of the simple -objective OneMinMax problem when ≥ 3.In this work, we provide the first mathematical runtime analysis of the NSGA-III, a refinement of the NSGA-II aimed at better handling more than two objectives.We prove that the NSGA-III with sufficiently many reference points -a small constant factor more than the size of the Pareto front, as suggested for this algorithmcomputes the complete Pareto front of the 3-objective OneMinMax benchmark in an expected number of ( log ) iterations.This result holds for all population sizes (that are at least the size of the Pareto front).It shows a drastic advantage of the NSGA-III over the NSGA-II on this benchmark.This paper for the Hot-off-the-Press track at
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wietheger et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: