The paper deals with the comparison in dimension two between the strong Jacobian determinant det0.56905pt det and the weak (or distributional) Jacobian determinant Det0.56905pt Det . Restricting ourselves to dimension two, we extend the classical results of Ball and Müller as well as more recent ones to bounded variation vector-valued functions, providing a sufficient condition on a vector-valued U in BV(Ω )² B V ( Ω ) 2 such that the equality det0.56905pt(∇ U)=Det0.56905pt(∇ U) det ( ∇ U ) = Det ( ∇ U ) holds either in the distributional sense on Ω Ω , or almost-everywhere in Ω Ω when U is in W1,1(Ω )² W 1 , 1 ( Ω ) 2 . The key-assumption of the result is the regularity of the Jacobian matrix-valued ∇ U ∇ U along the direction of a given non vanishing vector field b∈ C¹(Ω )² b ∈ C 1 ( Ω ) 2 , i.e. ∇ U\, b ∇ U b is assumed either to belong to C⁰(Ω )² C 0 ( Ω ) 2 with one of its coordinates in C¹(Ω ) C 1 ( Ω ) , or to belong to C¹(Ω )² C 1 ( Ω ) 2 . Two examples illustrate this new notion of two-dimensional distributional determinant. Finally, we prove the lower semicontinuity of a polyconvex energy defined for vector-valued functions U in BV(Ω )² B V ( Ω ) 2 , assuming that the vector field b and one of the coordinates of ∇ U\, b ∇ U b lie in a compact set of regular vector-valued functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Briane et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: