We consider properties of the diagonal of a continuum that are used later in the paper. We continue the study of T-closed subsets of a continuum X. We prove that for a continuum X, the statements: ΔX is a nonblock subcontinuum of X², ΔX is a shore subcontinuum of X² and ΔX is not a strong centre of X² are equivalent, this result answers in the negative Questions 35 and 36 and Question 38 (i∈\4,5\) of the paper ``Diagonals on the edge of the square of a continuum, by A. Illanes, V. Mart\'inez-de-la-Vega, J. M. Mart\'inez-Montejano and D. Michalik''. We also include an example, giving a negative answer to Question 1.2 of the paper ``Concerning when F₁(X) is a continuum of colocal connectedness in hyperspaces and symmetric products, Colloquium Math., 160 (2020), 297-307'', by V. Mart\'inez-de-la-Vega, J. M. Mart\'inez-Montejano. We characterised the T-closed subcontinua of the square of the pseudo-arc. We prove that the T-closed sets of the product of two continua is compact if and only if such product is locally connected. We show that for a chainable continuum X, ΔX is a T-closed subcontinuum of X² if and only if X is an arc. We prove that if X is a continuum with the property of Kelley, then the following are equivalent: ΔX is a T-closed subcontinuum of X², X²ΔX is strongly continuumwise connected, ΔX is a subcontinuum of colocal connectedness, and X²ΔX is continuumwise connected. We give models for the families of T-closed sets and T-closed subcontinua of various families of continua.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camargo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: