The author considers the controversy of unity of contract system principle’s definition because of inaccurate statutory wording in the Law on contract system and concludes its non-implementation in provisions of law. The author indicates the financial model of contract system institution and substantiates the significant controversy of the Law on contract system to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Thus the author considers the fault of the institute of contract system itself. It is proved the inner fault because of insufficiently thought-out conceptual apparatus of the Law on contract system. Contradiction and disunity of the Law on contract system is justified, that leads to the lack of unity because of the weak legal technique when preparing the law, what is evidenced by constant and numerous amendments of Law on contract system designed to eliminate the inaccuracies. The author considers that the result of these problems and shortcomings of the Law on contract system being evidence of unrealization unity of contract system principle is lack of uniform application practice of that law.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna V. Gapanovich (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: