Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The closure of educational institutions due to COVID-19 conditions created a situation where contact between students and teachers became almost impossible. It imposed a potential need for adopting alternative learning methods. Objective: The objective of this study was to carry out an evaluation of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning methods planned among MBBS students. Materials and Methods: An educational interventional study was carried out, including two equipotent academic potential groups of all students of phase 3 part one. Two groups were created (Group A – Synchronous and Group B – Asynchronous) and taught five sessions for each group with asynchronous and synchronous e-learning styles, and perceptions of students regarding learning style were recorded. The data were analyzed using SPSS, and paired t -test and independent t -test were used to compare responses. A descriptive analysis of responses received for perceptions of both learning on a 5-point Likert was carried out. Results: Despite the asynchronous group having a higher pretest mean score (33.63 ± 12.03) compared to the synchronous group (25.20 ± 10.1), the post-test mean scores revealed greater improvement in the synchronous group (82.21 ± 12.2) compared to the asynchronous group (81.08 ± 13.32). The study revealed statistically significant higher posttest scores ( P < 0.001) in both groups. Asynchronous e-learning was slightly preferable for phase 3 students compared to synchronous e-learning based on the perception given by students. Conclusion: Online methods and teaching implemented with the right planning will definitively serve as an alternative in situations like COVID-19. Although these methods cannot replace face-to-face learning, they help develop students’ interest in new learning styles and prepare them for adverse learning conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: