PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 9, 2024Scientific Reports9 citationsOpen Access

Recovery effect of self‐myofascial release treatment using different type of a foam rollers

View Full Paper
BMBartłomiej MichalakAKAnna KopiczkoRGRobert Gajda

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Among athletes, foam rolling is popular technique of myofascial release aimed to support recovery processes and counteract delayed onset muscle soreness. However, there is no consensus on the optimal parameters of the roller texture used in the procedure. The study aimed to determine whether using rollers with different textures and hardness (smooth/soft, grooved/mid, serrated/hard) in myofascial release affects post-exertional restitution rate and the level of perceived DOMS (Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness) after intense anaerobic exercise. The study involved 60 healthy and physically active men randomly divided into three experimental groups and one control group (passive rest)—each consisting of 15 individuals: STH—rolling with a smooth roller; G—rolling with a grooved roller; TP—rolling with a serrated roller; Pass—passive rest group. After performing a exercise test (one-minute high-intensity squat), blood lactate (LA), creatine kinase (CK) and pain perception (VAS Scale) were monitored. The analysis of the average LA concentration in the blood 30 min post-exercise showed a statistical difference for all rolling groups compared to the passive rest group: STH (p < 0.001), G (p < 0.001), TP (p = 0.035). No statistically significant differences were found between the CK measurement results in individual assessments. Statistically significant differences in VAS values were observed between G (p = 0.013) and TP (p = 0.006) groups and the Pass group at 48 h, as well as between STH (p = 0.003); G (p = 0.001); TP (p < 0.001) groups and the Pass group at 72 h. Based on statistical data, a strong influence (η 2 = 0.578) of time on the quadriceps VAS variable was noted. The research results confirm the effectiveness of rolling in supporting immediate and prolonged recovery. The conducted studies indicate a significantly better pace of post-exertional recovery after a rolling procedure lasting at least 120 s. The texture and hardness of the tool used did not matter with such a duration of the treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Michalak et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60e3db6db6435875a0bedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66577-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1To Be a Champion of the 24-h Ultramarathon Race. If Not the Heart ... Mosaic Theory?2021 · 13 citations
  2. 2Foam Rolling as a Recovery Tool after an Intense Bout of Physical Activity2013 · 275 citations
  3. 3The Effects Of Foam Rolling On Exercise Induced Muscle Damage2020 · 2 citations
  4. 4The Mechanisms of Massage and Effects on Performance, Muscle Recovery and Injury Prevention2005 · 783 citations
  5. 5Effectiveness of One-Time Self-Massage Using a Foam Roller in Reducing Functional Limitations of the Musculoskeletal System2024 · 1 citations