Figure 1: Graphical representation of the traditional HL (left) and our Neuron-centric Hebbian Learning model (right).Regarding HL, when the network is initialized (first arrow) it starts a loop of observations and actions, in which HL updates the weights (black arrow) by using the equation shown in the red box (see also Equation ( 2)).As can be seen, the parameters of the Hebbian rule in HL are specific to each synapse, leading to a total of 5 parameters to optimize, with being the number of synapses.Alternatively, our NcHL model (right) updates the weights (black arrow) by using the equation shown in the blue box (see also Equation ( 3)).In this case, the parameters of the Hebbian rule are specific to each neuron, hence resulting in a total of 5 parameters to optimize, with being the number of neurons.Assuming ≪ , optimizing NcHL models becomes notably less difficult than optimizing HL models, yet achieving comparable performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferigo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: