The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is thought to be bottom-heavy in the cores of the most massive galaxies, with an excess of low mass stars compared to the Milky Way. However, studies of the kinematics of quiescent galaxies at 2<z<5 find M/L ratios that are better explained with lighter IMFs. Light IMFs have also been proposed for the unexpected populations of luminous galaxies that JWST has uncovered at z>7, to reduce tensions with galaxy formation models. Here we explore IMFs that are simultaneously bottom-heavy, with a steep slope at low stellar masses, and top-heavy, with a shallow slope at high masses. We derive a form of the IMF for massive galaxies that is consistent with measurements in the local universe and yet produces relatively low M/L ratios at high redshift. This `concordance' IMF has slopes γ₁=2.40±0.09, γ₂=2.00±0.14, and γ₃=1.85±0.11 in the regimes 0.1-0.5 Msun, 0.5-1 Msun, and >1 Msun respectively. The IMF parameter α, the mass excess compared to a Milky Way IMF, ranges from log(α)≈+0.3 for present-day galaxies to log(α)≈-0.1 for their star forming progenitors. The concordance IMF applies only to the central regions of the most massive galaxies, with velocity dispersions ~300 km/s, and their progenitors. However, it can be generalized using a previously-measured relation between α and σ. We arrive at the following modification to the Kroupa (2001) IMF for galaxies with σ 160 km/s: γ₁≈1.3+4.3logσ₁₆₀; γ₂≈2.3-1.2logσ₁₆₀; and γ₃≈2.3-1.7logσ₁₆₀, with σ₁₆₀=σ/160 km/s. If galaxies grow primarily inside-out, so that velocity dispersions are relatively stable, these relations should also hold at high redshift.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dokkum et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: