Abstract Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard for assessing the physiological significance of coronary stenosis. We examined the potential correlation between digitally measured coronary cross-sectional area stenosis by coronary CT angiography, and the FFR. We analyzed 32 consecutive patients with stenoses who underwent invasive FFR determination. The cross-sectional area was assessed using 128-slice coronary detector-based spectral CT angiography. Power analysis revealed that the sample size enabled the detection of an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.90. FFR ≤ 0.8 and > 0.8 were defined as FFR-positive and FFR-negative, respectively. Intra- and inter-observer differences were negligible. AUC indicated that cross-sectional area reduction effectively discriminated between FFR-positive and FFR-negative cases, yielding a sensitivity of 0.882 and specificity of 0.933 at the cutoff of 50% area reduction, with an AUC of 0.976. Lesions with less than 45% cross-sectional area reduction on coronary CT angiography were not FFR-positive. When ROC analysis was conducted for lesion characteristics, AUC did not significantly improve. In conclusion, the coronary cross-sectional area stenosis severity from coronary CT angiography distinguished between FFR-positive and FFR-negative lesions with high accuracy. Area reduction on CT angiography is indicated to be clinically useful for predicting the FFR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koumoto et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: