Objective To compare strength of left paramedian colopexies using various techniques in equine ex vivo models. Study design Experimental study. Sample population Equine cadavers euthanized for nongastrointestinal pathology (36 specimens derived from 9 horses). Methods Colopexies were performed after euthanasia. Suture pattern (horizontal mattress vs. cruciate) and incorporation of dorsal sheath of the rectus abdominis (partial‐thickness) versus incorporation of dorsal and ventral sheath of the rectus abdominis (full‐thickness) were evaluated. Single cycle load to failure, work to peak load, stiffness, and mode of failure of colopexy tissue constructs were assessed. Results Mean load to failure of all constructs ranged from 102.26 to 166.38 N. Partial‐thickness bites demonstrated a mean load to failure and standard deviation (SD) of 111.91 (35.88) N and 102.26 (30.06) N ( p < .05) which was significantly lower than the mean and SD of full‐thickness bites (166.3 [72.42] N and 163.21 [51.40 N]), respectively. All full‐thickness bites regardless of suture pattern and over half of partial‐thickness bites failed at the colonic wall. There was no significant difference in load to failure compared to mode of failure. Conclusion A stronger colopexy was achieved with a full‐thickness bite regardless of the suture pattern. The most common mode of failure was the colon wall. Clinical significance Incorporating ventral and dorsal fascia of the rectus abdominus provided a stronger colopexy structure, which may necessitate a second incision or subcutaneous palpation of the needle when performing a colopexy. The lateral band of the colon failed in most constructs (77%) regardless of technique, which could weaken the colonic wall and risk colonic rupture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaitán et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: