Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction includes a heterogenous group of patients. Reclassification into distinct phenogroups to enable targeted interventions is a priority. This study aimed to identify distinct phenogroups, and compare phenogroup characteristics and outcomes, from electronic health record data. Methods 2,187 patients admitted to five UK hospitals with a diagnosis of HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40% were identified from the NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative database. Partition-based, model-based, and density-based machine learning clustering techniques were applied. Cox Proportional Hazards and Fine-Gray competing risks models were used to compare outcomes (all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for HF) across phenogroups. Results Three phenogroups were identified: (1) Younger, predominantly female patients with high prevalence of cardiometabolic and coronary disease; (2) More frail patients, with higher rates of lung disease and atrial fibrillation; (3) Patients characterised by systemic inflammation and high rates of diabetes and renal dysfunction. Survival profiles were distinct, with an increasing risk of all-cause mortality from phenogroups 1 to 3 ( p < 0.001). Phenogroup membership significantly improved survival prediction compared to conventional factors. Phenogroups were not predictive of hospitalisation for HF. Conclusions Applying unsupervised machine learning to routinely collected electronic health record data identified phenogroups with distinct clinical characteristics and unique survival profiles.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fardad Soltani
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
David A. Jenkins
University of Manchester
Amit Kaura
General Cardiology
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
University of Oxford
University College London
Imperial College London
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Soltani et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e614b6b6db6435875a7731 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03987-9
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: