Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background The definition of Takayasu arteritis (TAK) remission and disease activity is still unclear. Vascular imaging is an essential tool for following-up patients. Herein, we aimed to compare the evolution of vascular lesions (i.e. vessel wall thickening and stenosis) under conventional cDMARDs relatively to biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) in TAK patients followed with the same CT angiography modalities. Method We compared 75 lines of therapy in TAK patients who received cDMARDs (n = 40 lines) and bDMARDs (n = 35 lines) using CT angiography. We established 1–3 main target vessels with vessel wall thickening and/or stenosis. Every targeted vessel had its thickness and its lumen diameter measured at the initiation of immunosuppressive treatment and at 12 months. Results We observed an overall reduction in arterial wall thickness in 73% of cases and 31% had 25% relative decrease in the wall thickness. Using a linear mixed effects model, first-line immunosuppressive therapy (P = 0.012) and bDMARDs relatively to cDMARDs (P = 0.026) were independently associated with vessel wall thickness reduction in TAK. Thirty-eight percent of the stenotic vessels had a 25% relative increase in lumen diameter under immunosuppressive therapy. The relative increase 25% in lumen diameter was noted in 56% vs 17% with bDMARDs compared with cDMARDs. Conclusion Immunosuppressive treatments can reduce arterial wall thickness and widen lumen diameter in TAK. bDMARDs seem to be more effective than cDMARDs to improve arterial lesions in TAK.
Bletry et al. (Fri,) studied this question.