Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background A large proportion of patients with foregut cancers do not receive guideline-concordant treatment (GCT). This study sought to understand underlying barriers to GCT through a root cause analysis approach. Methods A single-institution retrospective review of 498 patients with foregut (gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary) adenocarcinoma from 2018 to 2022 was performed. Guideline-concordant treatment was defined based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The Ishikawa cause and effect model was used to establish main contributing factors to non-GCT. Results Overall, 34% did not receive GCT. Root causes of non-GCT included Patient, Physician, Institutional Environment and Broader System-related factors. In decreasing order of frequency, the following contributed to non-GCT: receipt of incomplete therapy ( N = 28, 16.5%), deconditioning on chemotherapy ( N = 26, 15.3%), delays in care because of patient resource constraints followed by loss to follow-up ( N = 19, 11.2%), physician factors ( N = 19, 11.2%), no documentation of treatment plan after referral to oncologic expertise ( N = 19, 11.2%), loss to follow-up before oncology referral ( N = 17, 10%), nonreferral to medical oncologic expertise ( N = 16, 9.4%), nonreferral to surgical oncology in patients with resectable disease ( N = 15, 8.8%), and complications preventing completion of treatment ( N = 11, 6.5%). Non-GCT often was a function of multiple intersecting patient, physician, and institutional factors. Conclusions A substantial percentage of patients with foregut cancer do not receive GCT. Solutions that may improve receipt of GCT include development of automated systems to improve patient follow-up; institutional prioritization of resources to enhance staffing; financial counseling and assistance programs; and development and integration of structured prehabilitation programs into cancer treatment pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fonseca et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: