Summary Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi distribute tree‐derived carbon (C) via belowground hyphal networks in forest ecosystems. Here, we asked the following: (1) Is C transferred belowground to a neighboring tree retained in fungal structures or transported within the recipient tree? (2) Is the overlap of ectomycorrhizal fungi in mycorrhizal networks related to the amount of belowground C transfer? We used potted sapling pairs of European beech ( Fagus sylvatica ) and North‐American Douglas‐fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii ) for 13 CO 2 pulse‐labeling. We compared 13 C transfer from beech (donor) to either beech or Douglas‐fir (recipient) and identified the ECM species. We measured the 13 C enrichment in soil, plant tissues, and ECM fractions of fungal‐containing parts and plant transport tissues. In recipients, only fungal‐containing tissue of ectomycorrhizas was significantly enriched in 13 C and not the plant tissue. Douglas‐fir recipients shared on average one ECM species with donors and had a lower 13 C enrichment than beech recipients, which shared on average three species with donors. Our results support that recently assimilated C transferred belowground is shared among fungi colonizing tree roots but not among trees. In mixed forests with beech and Douglas‐fir, the links for C movement might be hampered due to low mycorrhizal overlap with consequences for soil C cycling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Audisio et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: