PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2024European Journal of Operational Research76 citationsOpen Access

Fifty years of multiple criteria decision analysis: From classical methods to robust ordinal regression

View Full Paper
SGSalvatore GrecoRSRoman SłowińskiJWJyrki Wallenius

Key Points

  • MCDA procedures support decision-makers by providing models for evaluating conflicting criteria, leading to better decisions.
  • Over the last fifty years, MCDA has evolved with distinct methods that reflect differing types of preference information and models.
  • The review highlights the challenges in aggregating conflicting criteria into a mathematical preference model that reflects values accurately and effectively for DMs in various settings. MCDA's development triggers new research avenues and applications, enhancing decision-making across diverse fields.

Abstract

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a subfield of Operational Research that aims to support Decision-Makers (DMs) in the decision-making process through mathematical models and computational procedures. In this perspective, MCDA employs structured and traceable protocols to identify potential actions and the criteria for evaluating them. MCDA procedures aim to define recommendations consistent with the preferences of DMs for the specific decision problem at hand. These problems are generally formulated in terms of either choosing the best action, classifying actions into pre-defined and ordered decision classes, or ranking actions from best to worst. As the evaluation criteria are generally conflicting, the main challenge is to aggregate them into a mathematical preference model representing the DM value system. We review the development of MCDA over the past fifty years and describe its evolution with examples of distinctive methods. They are distinguished by the type of preference information elicited by DMs, the type of the preference model (criteria aggregation), and the way of converting the preference relation induced by the preference model in the set of potential actions into a decision recommendation. We focus on MCDA methods with a finite set of actions. References to specific application areas will be given. In the conclusion section, some prospective avenues of research will be outlined.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Greco et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e61ca0b6db6435875aec39https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.07.038
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE2012 · 174 citations
  2. 2Using convex preference cones in multiple criteria decision making and related fields2019 · 4 citations
  3. 3On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application2018 · 85 citations
  4. 4Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis2001 · 1,636 citations
  5. 5Necessary and possible preference structures2013 · 57 citations