PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2024Radiology3 citations

Assessing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Impact on Early Cancer Detection: Insights from Consecutive Screening

View Full Paper
AJAnnika JögiKJKristin JohnsonSWSofia Wittgren

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background Analysis of how digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening affects consecutive screening performance is important to estimate its future value in screening. Purpose To evaluate whether DBT contributes to early detection of breast cancer by assessing cancer detection rates (CDRs), including the fraction of invasive cancers and cancer subtypes in consecutive routine digital mammography (DM). Materials and Methods The paired prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST) was performed between January 2010 and February 2015. Participating women underwent one-view DBT and two-view DM at one screening occasion. In this secondary analysis, women were followed up through their first (DM1) and second (DM2) consecutive two-view DM screening rounds after MBTST participation. Cancer diagnoses were identified by referencing records. A logistic regression model, adjusted for age, was used to calculate the odds of luminal A-like cancers with use of the MBTST as reference. Results There were 14 848 final participants in the MBTST (median age, 57 years IQR, 49-65 years). Of those, 12 876 women were screened in DM1 (median age, 58 years IQR, 50-66 years) and 10 883 were screened in DM2 (median age, 59 years IQR, 51-67 years). Compared with CDRs in the trial of 6.5 of 1000 women (95% CI: 5.2, 7.9) for DM and 8.7 of 1000 women (95% CI: 7.3, 10.3) for DBT, the CDR was lower in DM1 (4.6 of 1000 women 95% CI: 3.6, 5.9) and DM2 (5.3 of 1000 women 95% CI: 4.1, 6.9). The proportion of invasive cancers was 84.9% (118 of 139 cancers) in the MBTST; the corresponding numbers were 66% (39 of 59 cancers) for DM1 and 83% (50 of 60 cancers) for DM2. The odds of luminal A-like cancers were lower in DM1 at 0.28 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.66 [

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jögi et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e61dfeb6db6435875b04f8https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233417
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Tumor Characteristics in the Prospective Population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial2021 · 79 citations
  2. 2False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial2023 · 8 citations
  3. 3Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway2019 · 81 citations
  4. 4Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications2001 · 11,002 citations
  5. 5Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study2013 · 836 citations