The Google Earth Engine (GEE) was used to investigate the performance of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) soil temperature (ST) data against observed ST from 13 synoptic stations over a semiarid region in Iran. Three‐hourly ST data were collected and analyzed in two depths (0–10 cm; 40–100 cm) and 5 years. In each depth, GLDAS‐Noah ST data were evaluated for daily minimum, maximum, and average ST (i.e., T min , T max , and T avg ). Based on the correlation coefficient, Kling–Gupta Efficiency, and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency the overall performance of the GLDAS‐Noah is 0.96, 0.66, and 0.79 for T min ; 0.97, 0.84, and 0.89 for T avg ; and 0.95, 0.89, and 0.89 for T max , respectively in the first layer. Likewise, 0.97, 0.85, and 0.86 for T min ; 0.97, 0.77, and 0.80 for T avg ; and 0.97, 0.69, and 0.69 for T max are obtained in the second layer. However, there is a significant negative bias which tends to underestimate ST in the two investigated layers, given by an average bias over all the stations analyzed of −24%, −12%, and −5% for T min , T avg , and T max in the first layer, and average bias of −8%, −13%, and −17% for T min , T avg , and T max in the second layer. This study reveals that GLDAS‐Noah‐derived ST can be used in arid regions where little or no observation data is available. Moreover, GEE performed as an advanced geospatial processing tool in regional scale analysis of ST in different layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbari et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: