For <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>≥</m:mo> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> n≥ 2 , let <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>A</m:mi> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo lspace="0.222em" rspace="0.222em">∗</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</m:mi> <m:mo lspace="0.222em" rspace="0.222em">∗</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>A</m:mi> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> G₁=A₁ Aₙ and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>B</m:mi> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo lspace="0.222em" rspace="0.222em">∗</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</m:mi> <m:mo lspace="0.222em" rspace="0.222em">∗</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>B</m:mi> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> G₂=B₁ Bₙ where the <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>A</m:mi> <m:mi>i</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> Aᵢ ’s and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>B</m:mi> <m:mi>i</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> Bᵢ ’s are non-elementary relatively hyperbolic groups. Suppose that, for <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>≤</m:mo> <m:mi>i</m:mi> <m:mo>≤</m:mo> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> 1≤ i≤ n , the Bowditch boundary of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>A</m:mi> <m:mi>i</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> Aᵢ is homeomorphic to the Bowditch boundary of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>B</m:mi> <m:mi>i</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> Bᵢ . We show that the Bowditch boundary of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:msub> </m:math> G₁ is homeomorphic to the Bowditch boundary of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msub> </m:math> G₂ . We generalize this result to graphs of relatively hyperbolic groups with finite edge groups. This extends Martin–Świątkowski’s work in the context of relatively hyperbolic groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravi Tomar (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: