The incidence of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is rising annually, necessitating effective monitoring strategies. Computed Tomography (CT) and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) are pivotal in this regard but differ in diagnostic accuracy due to their distinct imaging capabilities. This retrospective study evaluates 56 lymphoma patients using both modalities at Al-Ahli Hospital, Hebron, Palestine, from 2020 to 2023. Demographic and clinical data, alongside imaging findings, were analyzed. Results indicate PET/CT's superiority over CT alone, with higher sensitivity, specificity, precision, Accuracy where CT findings were 20%, 30.61%, 0.72%, and 30.34% retrospectively compared with PET/CT findings. Gender-specific analysis revealed marginal associations, highlighting the need for tailored imaging strategies. The study underscores PET/CT's enhanced diagnostic performance in lymphoma surveillance, advocating its use for improved patient management and outcomes. Further research could refine these findings, addressing the evolving landscape of lymphoma imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: