Abstract: This Article discusses on Pierre Rosanvallon’s conceptual history of democracy both as a method to understand the antinomy and the pathology of democracy and as a reflection of the generality of moral politics. For this purpose, the article will consist into three parts. The first one will deal with Rosanvallon’s conceptual history of democracy. The second part will delve into the problem of antinomy and pathology of democracy. And the third part will focus of the search for the normativity which is based on the moral generality. As conclusion, the article will invite the researchers to pay attention to the possibility of searching local wisdom as the clues to build the moral generality which is based on social relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikhael Dua (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: