Concept of noogenic immaturity according to the rotal jurisprudence

The paper delves into the concept of “noogenic immaturity” introduced by Msgr. Erlebach in a post-Sentence reflection. Stemming from Viktor Frankl’s work, this notion expands the understanding of psycho-affective immaturity within the context of matrimonial consent. Msgr. Erlebach outlines the criteria for this psycho-affective immaturity, emphasising its dual assessment involving both the noetic and psychic dimensions. The paper explores the challenges in judicial evaluation, urging a nuanced approach considering divergent value systems among Tribunal Experts. The text also prompts further inquiries into the sources, factors, and ethical considerations surrounding noogenic immaturity. Additionally, it suggests a reevaluation of legal and ethical systems in the digital age and raises questions about its potential extension to other grounds for matrimonial nullity. Overall, the discussion invites a deeper exploration of the intricate interplay between values, spirituality, and psychological dimensions in the assessment of marital consent.