Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background Limited information is available regarding the use of a coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) plus stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (S-CMR) strategy in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Purpose We sought to evaluate safety and efficacy of a CCTA plus S-CMR strategy in CCS patients. Methods At our tertiary care center, 115 patients with suspected CCS at low-intermediate risk first underwent CCTA. Subsequently, those showing intermediate coronary plaques (stenosis 30-70%) underwent S-CMR. Patients with a positive S-CMR were referred for invasive coronary angiopraphy (ICA) plus instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and myocardial revascularization if recommended. All patients received guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), including high-dose statins, regardless of myocardial revascularization. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization. Results According to the results of CCTA, 62 patients showing intermediate coronary plaques underwent S-CMR, which resulted positive for myocardial perfusion deficit in n=17 (27%) and negative in n=45 (73%) patients. According to the results of ICA plus iFR, revascularization was performed in 13 patients. No differences in the primary endpoint between the positive and negative S-CMR groups were observed at 1 year (1 5.9% vs. 1 2.2%, P=0.485) and after a median of 33.4 months (2 11.8% vs. 3 6.7%; P=0.605). Throughout the follow-up, no events were observed in patients with no/minimal plaques at CCTA. Conclusions Our study suggests that a CCTA plus S-CMR strategy is effective for the evaluation of patients with suspicion of CCS at low-intermediate risk, and it may help to refine the selection of patients with intermediate coronary plaques at CCTA needing coronary revascularization.
Busi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: