⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

June 26, 2024Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Impact of intravascular ultrasound‐guided endovascular therapy on periprocedural outcomes in patients with lower‐extremity artery disease

Sho Nakao Mitsuyoshi Takahara Osamu Iida Shun Kohsaka Tetsuya Amano Hideki Ishii Toshiro Shinke Tatsuya Nakama Masahiko Fujihara Toshiaki Mano Ken Kozuma

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Although technological improvements in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) may reduce technical failures in endovascular therapy (EVT), perioperative complications (POCs) associated with IVUS use may increase.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Nakao et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e633b8b6db6435875c5b6c https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31134

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1IntraVascular UltraSound After Below-The-Knee Endovascular Therapy: an Observational Pilot Study2025
2Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided endovascular interventions for peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysisRCT · 2026
3Endovascular therapy in intermittent claudication: Impact of IVUS guidance on treatment decisions2024 · 2 citations
4Intravascular ultrasound-guided endovascular treatment for deep vein thrombosis: a multicenter study from Japancohort · 2025
5Procedural Characteristics of Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Their Clinical Implicationscohort · 2022 · 13 citations