Integrated reference electrodes allow to deconvolute voltage contributions of anode and cathode and contribute to a better understanding of CO 2 electrolyzers. However, in zero‐gap cell configurations, this integration can be challenging and obtaining error‐free data with such a setup is a non‐trivial task. This study compares five different methods to integrate a reference electrode into an alkaline zero‐gap CO 2 electrolysis cell. Sources of error and measures to circumvent them are investigated and finite‐element simulation is used to gain a better understanding of observed effects. Placing a reference electrode into the inactive area of the cell is found to be a reliable method, as long as the placement of electrodes is sufficiently controlled. Sandwiching a wire quasi‐reference electrode between two membranes is especially useful for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; however, it can affect the overall cell performance. Contacting the catalyst layer from the backside with a salt‐bridge is promising for localized measurements if sufficient reproducibility can be ensured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bohn et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: