Abstract Background: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a globally significant, vector-borne, neglected tropical disease that can result in severe morbidity and disability. As the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis makes progress towards LF elimination, there is greater need to develop sensitive, post-intervention surveillance. Molecular xenomonitoring (MX), the detection of pathogen DNA in vectors and other biting insects, may provide a sensitive complement to traditional human-based surveillance techniques, including detection of circulating filarial antigen and microfilaraemia (Mf). This study aims to explore the relationship between human Mf prevalence and the prevalence of PCR-positive mosquitoes using MX. Methodology: We compared Mf and MX results from a 2019 community-based survey conducted in 35 primary sampling units (PSUs) in Samoa. We investigated concordance between presence and absence of PCR-positive mosquitoes and Mf-positive participants at the PSU level, and calculated sensitivity and negative predictive values for each indicator using presence of any Mf-indicated infection in humans or PCR-positive mosquitoes as a reference. Correlation between prevalence of filarial DNA in mosquitoes and Mf in humans was estimated at the PSU and household/trap level using mixed-effect Bayesian multilevel regression analysis. Results: Mf-positive individuals were identified in less than half of PSUs in which PCR-positive mosquito pools were present (13 and 28, respectively). Prevalence of filarial DNA in mosquitoes (each species separately) was positively correlated with Mf prevalence in humans at the PSU level. Analysed at the species level, only Aedes polynesiensis demonstrated strong evidence of positive correlation (r) with human Mf prevalence at both PSU (r: 0.46, 95% CrI: 0.05–0.81) and trap/household levels (r: 0.57, 95% CrI: 0.16–0.87). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that MX can be a sensitive surveillance method for identifying residual infection in low Mf prevalence settings. MX identified more locations with pathogen signals than Mf-testing. Strong correlation between estimated filarial DNA prevalence in the primary vector species and Mf in humans at small spatial scales demonstrates the utility of MX as an indicator for LF prevalence in Samoa and similar settings. Further investigation is needed to develop MX-based guidelines to strengthen the ability of MX to inform operational decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howlett et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: