Modernity deserves a place amidst the two or three words that, according to Raymond Williams, were the most complicated in English language. In this article, I unpack the term, argue that it pervades the discipline of International Relations (IR) and demonstrate its contestation in the work of Satyajit Ray. I start with the second task first by sketching the normalization of the idea of the nation-state in IR and show how this idea forms a point in the constellation of modernity as described by the modernisation school of development. I argue that this constellation-view is reflective of the mainstream theorisation of modernity which views it as a package. From here, I undertake the former task of unpacking the term for which I rely on the works of Sudipta Kaviraj. Finally, as Kaviraj contests the mainstream theorisation of modernity by putting forth a new framework (‘sequential modernity’), I demonstrate how the films of Satyajit Ray performed a similar and subtle contestation of the same. By examining his movies such as the Apur Sangsar and Pratidwandi, I argue that Ray symbolised the ‘Bengal Renaissance’ which stood for syncretism and coexistence. Drawing on Bengal’s intellectual class’ openness to cultures worldwide, I conclude this paper by highlighting the need for theorizing beyond the Hobbesian view of anarchy prevalent in IR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishan Fouzdar (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: