Purpose: Describe the clinical characteristics of the disease and preliminarily evaluate the clinical outcomes of systemic corticosteroid therapy for the management of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study, conducted on 20 patients examined and treated at Vietnam National Institute of Ophthalmology from March 2021 to December 2023. Outcomes: The study included 20 eyes in 20 patients (8 men and 12 women), the disease mainly started after age 50 (80%). Regarding risk factors for disease onset, 4/20 (20%) patients had a history of vascular disease (diabetes mellitus, hypertension), and 20/20 (100%) patients had a second eye (normal eye) with a crowded, narrow optic disc structure, with no cup. 70% of patients came to the doctor within 1 week of illness and vision below 20/100 accounted for 80%. All patients had an inferior altitudinal defect, with moderate to severe papilledema accounting for 95%. The duration of management with systemic corticosteroids between the time when the disease was detected and when the papilledema withdraws ranging from 1 to 3 weeks (average 2 weeks) accounted for 85%. After 6 months of management, 70% of patients maintained their visual acuity, and 25% of them had their visual acuity increased by 3 rows. 55% of patients preserved their visual field and 35% of them had their visual field improved. Conclusion: Understanding the clinical characteristics helped doctors diagnose, treat, and prognose the disease. The mean duration of using oral corticosteroids at a dose of 48 mg/day was 2 weeks ranging from when the disease was detected to when the papilledema was withdrawn. Although the study did not have a control group, initially it could illustrate that oral corticosteroids had the effect of cutting off the pathological spiral, preventing the progression of the disease, and partially improving vision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dat et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: