Cleft palate repair is a technically challenging procedure requiring delicate tissue handling and precision. In a pre- vious study, [1] our group demonstrated the advantages of using a surgical robot over traditional instruments in cleft palate repair. The 8 mm wrist was considered superior due to its more space-efficient articulation. However, the 8 mm diameter instruments are too large for the infant oral cavity. We have thus developed a novel 3 mm diameter pin-jointed wrist with a unique cable-guide channel and CAM mechanism to ensure more compact wrist articulation with a lower profile for this workspace [2]. Additionally, the tool profiles were optimized for infant cleft palate repair and trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS). The following study investigates the use of these 3 mm tools to perform knot-tying within the confines of the infant oral cavity using a high-fidelity cleft palate simulator. Their performance was compared to the 8 mm da Vinci EndoWrist instruments to determine the advantages of using these smaller tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: