Ionic conductivity in solid electrolytes is commonly expected to exhibit Arrhenius dependence on temperature, determined by a well-defined activation energy. Consequently, a standard approach involves calculating this energy using quasi-static methods and using the Arrhenius form to extrapolate the numerical results from one temperature range to another. Despite the ubiquity of this Arrhenius-based modeling, disagreements frequently arise between theory and experiment, and even between different theoretical studies. By considering a tractable minimal model, we elucidate the reason behind the breakdown of the Arrhenius conductivity form. This breakdown is driven by nontrivial phase-space boundaries between conducting and nonconducting regimes, and depends on the kinetic properties of the system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noori et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: