Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anomaly-based network intrusion detection would appear on the surface to be ideal for detection of zero-day network threats. Yet in practice, their often unacceptably high false positive rates keep them on the sideline in favor of signature-based methods, which typically detect known threats. We argue that an anomaly-based network intrusion detection system should not only be specialized to a specific class of related threats, but characteristics of the threat class itself should be utilized when designing both the detection system and structuring the network data to use with the system. To this end, we take two common network threat classes, DDoS-as-a-Smokescreen (DaaSS) and SYN flood, and analyze their characteristics for structure that we can use to specialize anomaly detection. We partition these threat classes into known behavior and unknown behavior, leaving the latter open-ended. Through experimentation on multiple datasets, we show that our proposed detection system based on this threat partitioning approach is capable of detecting DaaSS attacks and zero-day SYN flood variants with very low false positive rates, even in the face of concept drift, and can do so without having to collect large amounts of benign network traffic for training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ricks et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: