Defoliation and tree species determine growth during spruce budworm outbreaks, with site showing inconsistent effects. We determined effects of artificial defoliation treatments (0%, 50%, 100%, 100%+bud) for 3 years on volume increment of 240 balsam fir, black spruce, and white spruce trees, initially 7–10 years old and 2.3–4.1 m tall, on four soil drainage/richness classes. Current annual increment was significantly affected by species × site and site × defoliation interactions, with DBH as covariate. Specific volume increment (SVI) was significantly affected by a species × site × defoliation treatment interaction. Combining species and sites, volume reductions after 3 years were 21%–28%, 43%–51%, and 55%–66% for 50% defoliation, 100% defoliation, and 100%+bud. SVI was negatively, linearly related to cumulative defoliation. Marginal r 2 and conditional r 2 showed that 64% of variance of SVI was explained by site, species, cumulative defoliation, and DBH, but 90% was explained by fixed and random variables. After 3 years of defoliation, SVI of white spruce was 21%–23% greater than balsam fir and black spruce, and SVI on rich was 55%–79% greater than on poor sites. Cumulative defoliation was a good predictor of growth, and soil richness had a stronger effect on growth after defoliation than in previous studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacLean et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: