This special issue aims to deepen and diversify anthropological explorations of human volition. While volition is a central theme in philosophy and theology, its anthropological dimensions are less explored. This edited collection seeks to reposition human volition as a pivotal element of anthropological inquiry. The investigation extends into the realms of ethics/morality, freedom, and experience, opening new avenues for research. Comprising four anthropological studies, we explore volition across varied ethnographic settings, providing a rich backdrop for examining how volition is differently conceptualised, exercised, and contested. This issue introduces a conceptual framework, which offers a new lens to understand the heterogeneity and dynamics of volition, emphasising the balance between personal interiorities and sociocultural exteriorities, and between universalist humanism and cultural relativism. By offering fresh insights into human volition, we contribute to ongoing dialogues in anthropology about human agency and the complex interplay of cultural and social influences on willing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hau et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: