The paper explores some of the discussion points regarding the determination of the subject of administrative liability for committing offenses in the field of artificial intelligence-equipped vehicle operation. It is noted that legal regulation in the field of transportation safety, taking into account the emergence of electric vehicles, is actively evolving. However, the regulation of administrative liability for offenses in the field of vehicle operation with elements of artificial intelligence has not yet been reflected in current legislation. Based on the analysis conducted, the author draws several conclusions. Particularly, it is determined that there is a pressing need for regulating public relations considering the use of technologies with elements of artificial intelligence, especially in public legal relations, including administrative and criminal law. Presently, there are no specific provisions in modern administrative law dedicated to formulating offenses with regard to the use (operation) of technologies, including vehicles with elements of artificial intelligence. However, the author believes that this gap will be addressed by the legislator in the near future. Analysis of scientific literature led to the conclusion that the subject of administrative liability in this field should be differentiated based on the future composition of administrative offenses proposed by the legislator, as well as depending on the factual circumstances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dmitry O. Lunev (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: