The interplay between tonic and phasic pupil activity and cognitive flexibility and stability

Previous research has shown that while larger phasic pupillary activity indexes lower switch costs and better performance on a Stroop task, greater tonic pupillary activity indexes greater exploration. However, the direct influence of tonic-phasic pupillary activity on cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability – two control modes that potentially tradeoff with each other - has not been systematically investigated. We examine these associations using a task that imposes varying requirements on flexibility (task switching), and stability (distractor inhibition). The task included ambiguous trials which captured participants’ preference for cognitively flexible performance. Participants (n=51) completed the task with pupillary measurement recording. We find a lower preference to voluntarily switch (lower flexibility preference) in individuals with higher switch costs (lower ability/effort exerted to be flexible), and in individuals with faster RTs on Distractor Inhibition trials (higher stability), indicating a possible tradeoff between an individual’s cognitively stable performance and the preference to be flexible. Examining pupillary data, we show that a larger phasic pupillary response in Task Switch trials is associated with lower switch costs, i.e., higher flexibility. Individuals with larger average tonic pupil diameter were less likely to voluntarily switch tasks in ambiguous trials (i.e., lower flexibility preference), contrary to our expectations. Finally, we observed that higher tonic pupillary measures predicted quicker errors on trials measuring cognitive stability and greater overall task disengagement. Taken together, our findings shed light on the differential relationships between phasic pupillary activity and tonic pupil diameter and stable versus flexible modes of cognitive control.