Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Although undergraduates from all class backgrounds work while attending college, little is known about how students approach finding work and the benefits they reap from different on-campus roles. Drawing on interviews with 110 undergraduates at Harvard University, we show that in the absence of clear institutional expectations surrounding on-campus work opportunities, students draw on class-based strategies to determine which jobs are “right for them.” Upper-income students pursued “life of the mind” jobs that permitted them access to institutional resources and networks. Alternatively, lower-income students pursued more transactional “work for pay” positions that yielded fewer institutional benefits and connections. The consequences of these differential strategies were amplified during COVID-19 campus closures as work-for-pay positions were eliminated while life of the mind continued remotely. Through documenting heterogeneity in work experiences, we reveal a class-segregated labor market on campus and extend previous analyses of how university practices exacerbate class differences and reproduce inequality.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jack et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e643ceb6db6435875d4fbc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407241259793
Anthony Abraham Jack
Harvard University
Becca Spindel Bassett
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Sociology of Education
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: