Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND Low-grade glioma (LGG) is the most common childhood central nervous system tumor. Carboplatin/vincristine (CV) is a standard of care regimen used for incompletely resected tumors. Monthly carboplatin is an alternative regimen that has not been prospectively compared to CV previously in untreated patients. METHODS Patients ≤ 21 years with LGG and no treatment besides surgery were eligible. Patients were stratified according to NF1 status and randomized to Arm A (carboplatin/vincristine) or Arm B (carboplatin monthly). The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoint analysis is underway and includes quality of life, tumor response rates, toxicity and association of molecular alterations on outcomes. Analyses included log-rank test and descriptive statistics. RESULTS There were 95 evaluable patients with a median age of 5 (range 0-18) years; 67 non-NF1 subjects (32 Arm A, 35 Arm B) and 28 NF1 subjects (14 Arm A, 14 Arm B). Three-year PFS was superior for patients without NF1 treated on Arm A (58%; 95% CI: 38%, 74%) versus Arm B (33%; 95% CI: 18%, 49%) (p=0.04). In patients with NF1, there was no statistical difference in PFS between those treated on Arm A (71%; 95% CI: 41%, 88%) and Arm B (93%; 95% CI: 59%, 99%) (p=0.08). Grade 3/4 toxicity neutropenia was more commonly seen in Arm A patients compared to Arm B for both NF and non-NF1 patients. Peripheral neuropathy was also more commonly seen in non-NF1 patients (Grade 1-4; 32%) compared to NF1 patients (7%) for patients treated on Arm A. There were 15 carboplatin reactions (Grade 1-4); 7 non-NF1 on Arm A, 3 non-NF1 on Arm B, and 5 NF1 on Arm A. CONCLUSIONS Non-NF1 patients treated with carboplatin and vincristine show statistically significant improved PFS compared to monthly carboplatin. Patients with NF1 are statistically underpowered due to low accrual.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lenen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: