Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND While major advances have been made in improving the quality of life and survival of children with most forms of medulloblastoma (MB), those with MYC-driven tumors (Grp3-MB) still suffer significant morbidity and mortality. Here, we report a cell surface proteome analysis of Group3-MB cell lines after direct MYC inhibition to identify changes in surface proteins and sensitivity to macrophage-mediated phagocytosis. METHODS We had previously demonstrated the preferential activity of HDACi (CI994) in MYC-driven medulloblastoma. CI-994, showed significant cell viability reduction mediated by reduction in the MYC (mRNA and protein), induction of apoptosis in MYC-driven medulloblastoma. In this study, we directly inhibited MYC using MYCi975 and OMO-MYC and carried out a cell surface proteomic analysis on Group3-MB cell lines to reveal CD24 and CD59 as potential immune evasion markers. While CD24 is a potential don’t eat me signal, CD59 is a ubiquitously expressed cell-surface glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein that acts as an inhibitor to the membrane attack complex and protects cells from CDC. In certain tumors, CD59 expression is enhanced, posing a significant obstacle to treatment by hindering effective monoclonal antibody-induced CDC. We use inhibitors to CD24 and CD59 to confirm their role as innate immune evasion proteins in Group 3MB. RESULTS Meta-analysis of published datasets reveals CD24 and CD59 as strong prognostic indicators in Group3-MB as well as within the Group3g-subtype. Inhibition of MYC reduces surface levels of CD24, increasing macrophage-mediated phagocytosis. The use of a blocking anti-CD24 mAb significantly enhanced macrophage-mediated phagocytosis. Furthermore, a significant reduction in surface expression was observed in CD59. Blocking CD59 mAb significantly enhanced anti-CD47 mAb mediated phagocytosis. Combined treatment of anti-CD24 and anti-CD47 significantly enhanced the survival of Grp3-MB tumor-bearing mice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: