Purchasing firms naturally select the supplier with the lowest total cost. Often overlooked is the impact of the duration of long-term contracts (common in the automotive industry). We provide a method to quantify how risk escalates with contract duration. Our method applies to virtually all cost elements. For clarity, we demonstrate it on logistics costs that can change over a long horizon, resulting in a change in the relative attractiveness of candidate suppliers. We simulate a case study to estimate the likelihood that each supplier will provide the lowest cost over the contract duration. Finally, we quantify the risk reduction afforded by dividing a long contract into a sequence of shorter contracts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inman et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: