A bstract Phylogenetic comparative methods are indispensable for analyzing cross-species data while accounting for evolutionary relationships. Traditional methods like phylogenetically independent contrasts (PIC) and phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) are well-suited for gradual evolution under Brownian motion (BM) or similar assumptions. However, their effectiveness diminishes under abrupt evolutionary shifts or heterogeneous evolutionary processes. We introduce a hybrid framework, outlier-guided correlation (OGC) for large datasets and outlier- and distribution-guided correlation (ODGC) for small datasets, collectively termed O(D)GC, which integrates Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses to handle outliers and non-normal data dynamically. Using simulations across diverse evolutionary scenarios, we compared PIC-O(D)GC with a comprehensive range of methods, including eight robust regression approaches (PIC-MM, PIC-L1, PIC-S, PIC-M, and their PGLS counterparts); PGLS optimized using five evolutionary models: BM, lambda, Ornstein–Uhlenbeck random (OU-random), OU-fixed, and Early-burst; Corphylo (an OU-based method); PIC-Pearson; and two advanced models, phylogenetic generalized linear mixed models (PGLMM) and multi-response phylogenetic mixed models (MR-PMM). Our results demonstrate that PIC-O(D)GC and PIC-MM consistently exhibit superior performance under conditions with evolutionary shifts, maintaining low false positive rates and high accuracy. In no-shift scenarios, PIC-O(D)GC and PIC-MM perform comparably to other reliable methods, underscoring their adaptability and robustness across varied datasets. Furthermore, PIC-O(D)GC offers computational efficiency and flexibility, making it particularly suitable for large-scale datasets. These findings underscore the value of adaptive, nonparametric frameworks like PIC-O(D)GC in complementing traditional phylogenetic approaches. By bridging computational simplicity with methodological robustness, O(D)GC provides a versatile tool for trait correlation analysis in both stable and dynamic evolutionary contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: