The paper explores the profound philosophy of Santideva, focusing on the concept of emptiness and its implications on human agency and ways to prevent suffering through an argument reconstruction using analogies. A major issue Santideva highlights is how conventional truth, shaped by societal consensus and labels, veils the ultimate truth – the reality of things. Emptiness, as the absence of intrinsic nature in phenomena, becomes a cornerstone for understanding reality beyond conventional appearances. Santideva’s arguments challenge the notion of a self and illustrate how conditions influence experiences and the illusion of a continuous, unchanging “I .” This examination extends to self-awareness, refuting the mind’s ability to perceive itself independently. Navigating through the complexities of suffering and categorizing it into various forms - all stemmed from attachments and ignorance – that ultimately advocate the path to liberation through the Four Noble Truths, this paper encourages a practical application of Santideva’s philosophy in daily life, highlighting the need for practice and action over mere contemplation, paving the way toward understanding and embracing the elusive quest for liberation from suffering. The paper does not provide an answer; nonetheless, it should help inform readers without previous knowledge and researchers of the questions Santideva implores us to consider and offer a modern interpretation of Santideva’s definition of how to attain liberation from suffering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard Liao (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: