The article examines certain features of the phenomenon of a legal entity, including the scope and content of the regulatory wording “on behalf of and in the interests of” a legal entity enshrined in the Criminal Code of Ukraine, as well as theoretical aspects of application of criminal law measures to a legal entity. The author makes a reasoned assumption that one of the main reasons for the emergence of the legal entity phenomenon as a full-fledged persona of legal relations was the need to remove all interested individuals from legal control and liability. The author considers the granting of a legal entity with a category of certain interests as an act of anthropomorphisation, i.e. transfer of positive and negative human traits and characteristics to a legal entity. From the issues under consideration, the author moves on to the legal status of an artificial intelligence algorithm, including the possibility and/or expediency of recognising it as a persona of legal relations. To answer the question of the limits and methods of liability of a legal entity or a highly developed artificial intelligence algorithm, the author proposes to look for weaknesses by analogy with those of a human. The author makes proposals for improving the provisions of the current legislation of Ukraine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O. RADUTNIY (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: