Background: Complications are an inevitable part of orthopaedic surgery, and how one defines complications can have an impact on the ability to learn from them. There have been issues with a commonly used classification system first outlined by Clavien and Dindo. Our aim was to evaluate a modification of this classification system developed for use in our department, with our hypothesis being that this could make our audit presentations more efficient. Methods: A modified Clavien–Dindo Classification was prospectively applied to all complications recorded in the orthopaedic departmental audits at our institution for a 12-month period. The audit discussion was recorded and analysed and compared with the complication audits for the preceding 12-month period. Results: We analysed eight audit presentations before and eight audit presentations after the introduction of a modified Clavien–Dindo classification to our orthopaedic complications over a 2-year period. The number of PowerPoint™ slides (103 vs. 84, p = 0.03) and the time spent on each presentation (88 vs. 71 min, p = 0.02) decreased significantly with the introduction of the modified classification. The novel system was found to have high inter-observer reliability. Conclusions: The modified Clavien–Dindo classification system is a reproducible classification system for orthopaedic complications. It made our audit presentations more efficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talia et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: