We study the following game. Three players start with initial capitals of s₁,s₂,s₃ dollars; in each round player Pₘ is selected with probability 1/3; then he selects player Pₙ and they play a game in which Pₘ wins from (resp. loses to) Pₙ one dollar with probability pₘₙ (resp. pₙₘ=1-pₘₙ). When a player loses all his capital he drops out; the game continues until a single player wins by collecting everybody's money. This is a "strategic" version of the classical Gambler's Ruin game. It seems reasonable that a player may improve his winning probability by judicious selection of which opponent to engage in each round. We formulate the situation as a stochastic game and prove that it has at least one Nash equilibrium in deterministic stationary strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kehagias et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: