Abstract 31 undisturbed cohesive silts with plasticity indices ranging from 3 to 55% were tested in an erosion function apparatus to obtain their erodibility curves. The critical shear stress ( τ cr) τ cr ) was estimated by fitting a hyperbolic function to the erodibility curves. Tests were also conducted to obtain the index properties of each sample. Existing regression-based approaches cannot capture the complex and highly nonlinear relationship between τ cr τ cr and other common parameters of cohesive soils with great accuracy. Hence, two robust approaches, namely multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and genetic expression programming (GEP) are utilized to estimate the τ cr τ cr from easily measurable index soil properties. These soil properties are selected based on a literature review and correlation analysis between the τ cr τ cr and other parameters [e.g., water content, plastic limit, liquid limit, plasticity index, liquidity index, activity, median grain size, percent fines (particles smaller than 0.075 mm), percent clay (particles smaller than 2 μm), undrained shear strength, compression and recompression indices, soil unit weight, consolidation pressure, pre-consolidation pressure and void ratio]. Three statistical metrics namely coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), mean absolute error ( MAE ), and root mean square error ( RMSE ) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results indicate that the MARS approach outperformed GEP based on: (1) estimates from MARS ( R 2 = 0.992, MAE = 0.483 N/m 2 , and RMSE = 0.641 N/m 2 ) were better than those from GEP ( R 2 = 0.906, MAE = 1.445 N/m 2 and RMSE = 1.686 N/m 2 ); and (2) the MARS approach was able to detect the change in rate of variations of τ cr τ cr (i.e., points where the trend showed a change in slope) when samples from different locations were compared. Also, a sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate the importance of each selected model parameter on τ cr τ cr .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahimnejad et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: