NOTE. This article is now published in Science and Public Policy, scae064,https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae064 Published: 18 November 2024.We modelled patterns of collaboration, team gender composition, and funding amounts across awarded Australian government-funded competitive team research grants from 2000–2020. Among mid- and senior-career researchers, the percentage of grants awarded to women was higher for team grants than sole investigator grants compared to men at those levels. Teams led by women tended to have a greater percentage of women co-investigators than teams led by men, but this was below gender parity regardless of team leader gender. Funding amounts per grant did not differ by principal investigator gender and reached parity in 2020 across teams with both high and low representation of women. Since teams tend to be more gender-balanced when led by women, women’s grant leadership may be an important mechanism for shifting overall representation of women in research. We offer public policy measures to address gender equities in the research sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kingsley et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: