In this study, we investigate whether fast-vanishing visual stimuli can carry information that affects human behavior, even when individuals report not seeing it. The impact of fast-vanishing cues on oculomotor functions can impact our understanding of the role of high-frequency fixational eye movements as well as human cognition in general. It may also inform technological developments, in particular, on the potential impact of high-frequency cameras and screens. For this purpose, we designed an experiment with two main tasks. In the control task, we estimate how fast a stimulus should be to escape conscious detection. We find that when it is presented during 1/120s or 1/240s, participants do not notice this fast stimulus most of the time. In the second part of the experiment, we use this stimulus as a cue to where a visible target will appear for one second. We find that, even when the probability of consciously registering the presence of a cue is as small as 0.02, its presence has a significant impact on saccade reaction times (SRTs). For all cue durations tested, {1/60, 1/120, 1/240} s, the probability of SRTs being impacted by a cue is greater than the probability of (consciously) reporting its detection. We argue that a cue having an impact on SRTs even when it is not noticed is evidence of unconscious visual information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathema et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: