Background & Aims: Etomidate has a stable cardiac profile as an induction agent. But, reportedincidence of etomidate induced myoclonus is 50% to 80%. This study was conducted to compare theeffect of dexmedetomidine with fentanyl for reduction of etomidate induced myoclonus. Materialsand Method: This study was conducted in 60 ASA grade I,II,III patients in the age group of 18-55years undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomized and dividedinto 2 groups of 30 patients each. Group 1 received Inj. dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg /kg iv and Group 2received Inj. fentanyl 1 mcg /kg iv as a premedication slowly over 5 mins. After that, they wereadministered Inj. etomidate 0.3 mg/kg and were observed for myoclonus for 2 minutes. Severity ofetomidate induced myoclonus was assessed using four point intensity scoring. Safety of study drugswas compared using mean HR, mean BP and adverse events observed. Results: Myoclonus wasobserved in 36.67% patients after inj. dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg /kg and in 50% patients after inj. fentanyl 1 mcg /kg (P value = 0.046). Incidence of myoclonus with grade 1,2 and 3 was 26.66%, 10%and 0% respectively in group 1 and 33.33%, 13.33% and 3.33% in group 2 respectively. Conclusion:Incidence of etomidate induced myoclonus was significantly decreased in patients pre-treated withdexmedetomidine in comparison with fentanyl. In terms of severity grading, difference betweenthese two drugs was insignificant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thacker et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from BJKines National Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences