PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 2024JAMA Network Open78 citationsOpen Access

Bariatric Metabolic Surgery vs Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Mortality

View Full Paper
DDDror DickerYSYael Wolff SagyNRNoga Ramot

Key Points

  • Bariatric metabolic surgery was linked to lower mortality than GLP-1 receptor agonists among adults with diabetes duration under ten years, mediated by weight loss.
  • All-cause mortality was lower after bariatric metabolic surgery in patients with diabetes duration under ten years (HR 0.38), but MACE risk showed no difference (HR 0.74).
  • Retrospective cohort study matched 3,035 patient pairs over a median 6.8-year follow-up, supporting surgical metabolic intervention for substantial weight reduction.

Abstract

Importance Evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in reducing mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) is limited. Objective To compare all-cause mortality and nonfatal MACEs associated with BMS vs GLP-1RAs for adults with obesity and diabetes and without known cardiovascular disease. Design, Setting, and Participants This observational, retrospective cohort study was based on data obtained from the electronic medical records of Clalit Health Services (Clalit), the largest health care organization in Israel. The study included 6070 members aged 24 years or older, who had diabetes and obesity and no prior history of ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, or congestive heart failure. Patients who underwent BMS and patients who received GLP-1RAs from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2021, were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and clinical characteristics. Follow-up ended December 31, 2022. Exposures Initiation of BMS or GLP-1RAs. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. The secondary outcome was nonfatal MACEs, assessed by multivariate competing risk models. Results The study included 3035 matched pairs of patients (total, 6070; mean SD age, 51.0 9.5 years; 3938 women 64.9%), who were followed up for a median of 6.8 years (IQR, 4.1-9.4 years). Among those with a diabetes duration of 10 years or less (2371 pairs), mortality was lower for those who underwent BMS than for those treated with GLP-1RAs (hazard ratio HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.58). This association became nonsignificant when weight loss during the follow-up period was also included in the model (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.43-1.48). Among patients with a duration of diabetes longer than 10 years (664 pairs), no survival advantage was demonstrated for BMS over GLP-1RA (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39-1.08). The risk for nonfatal MACEs did not differ between the treatment groups (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.49-1.10 among patients with a diabetes duration of ≤10 years; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.80-1.85 among patients with a diabetes duration of gt;10 years). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, BMS was associated with greater reduced mortality compared with first-generation GLP-1RAs among individuals with a diabetes duration of 10 years or less, mediated via greater weight loss. No differences in the risk for mortality were observed between the treatment modalities among individuals with a longer duration of diabetes, nor in the occurrence of nonfatal MACEs among all patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dicker et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e65999b6db6435875e8ab0https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15392
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper